Refer to above statements,what's right;what's wrong..the normal definition are as follow;
对-define as things that majority agreed to as correct and acceptable...
错-define as things that majority not agree to as correct and unacceptable..
however,it should not be defined like that...it is impossible to find out whose right and whose wrong for every single unknown...
here are some example that can be taken as reference...
--why America/US attack Iraq?
US claims that Iraq have and are developing nuclear weapon for war use.so attack first to diminish it before Iraq are able to develop or use the weapon to attack US..at last,US can't find any related nuclear sources and weapons to prove their claims.For us,this is wrong,cause US attacked Iraq with the claims but proved there is no such things.
But,if we see from another angle,Iraq had military activities,with the ability to develop such weapons with huge destruction.So,before Iraq are able to complete it nuclear power and use to attack US,US take the 1st steps to destroy them 1st in order there won't be any miserable attacks by Iraq in future using their new weapons.
In order to protect their country before happen,there's not labeled as wrong decision to be taken.Prevent is better than Cure.US prevent Iraq..so,there is nothing wrong,right??
--why some helps from us are harms for some peoples?
this i take my own experience..
Company's stock check,we always do stock check for the showrooms in order not to get problems and ensure that stocks are always in good conditions and quantities.We the higher management scare that once company finds out that our stock got problem then blame us,so we check every single items.actually our scope of power are,check what u see on that time only,if don't have at the particular time,then it counted as lost stock.however,we never make like that since it relate to the management,and staffs themselves..we waste few days to check 1 showroom only,while normally other teams check few showroom in few days.and that's also shows our sincere and heart to helps them to settle the problem and not to get blame by highest management.
however,in their mind,we are just bringing problems for them,stock lost need to be pay by them once checked,and we 'anti' them,cause keep on checking the stocks,wants them to compensate for the stocks lost.
Once problem arise,beg us "really want take such actions,don't you feel pity for us?our family?kids?" this is not the issue,but correct for them,we do pity,but how pity also,work still need to be done..if not,help them cover?? then who pity us back??we don't have family?
We just working,serving company,company earn how much,loss how much also not ours.So,work should be done accordingly,responsible,don't harm anyone...we work to earn livings..some peoples says work is to earn experience,experience is important than payment,still correct,but with reasonable payments...if works without reasonable payment,just earn experience,does experience give u monthly income?? does experience can be foods for their family?can be income for living?so...it's still back to the title->what's right,what's wrong~So...do things accordingly...
对-define as things that majority agreed to as correct and acceptable...
错-define as things that majority not agree to as correct and unacceptable..
however,it should not be defined like that...it is impossible to find out whose right and whose wrong for every single unknown...
here are some example that can be taken as reference...
--why America/US attack Iraq?
US claims that Iraq have and are developing nuclear weapon for war use.so attack first to diminish it before Iraq are able to develop or use the weapon to attack US..at last,US can't find any related nuclear sources and weapons to prove their claims.For us,this is wrong,cause US attacked Iraq with the claims but proved there is no such things.
But,if we see from another angle,Iraq had military activities,with the ability to develop such weapons with huge destruction.So,before Iraq are able to complete it nuclear power and use to attack US,US take the 1st steps to destroy them 1st in order there won't be any miserable attacks by Iraq in future using their new weapons.
In order to protect their country before happen,there's not labeled as wrong decision to be taken.Prevent is better than Cure.US prevent Iraq..so,there is nothing wrong,right??
--why some helps from us are harms for some peoples?
this i take my own experience..
Company's stock check,we always do stock check for the showrooms in order not to get problems and ensure that stocks are always in good conditions and quantities.We the higher management scare that once company finds out that our stock got problem then blame us,so we check every single items.actually our scope of power are,check what u see on that time only,if don't have at the particular time,then it counted as lost stock.however,we never make like that since it relate to the management,and staffs themselves..we waste few days to check 1 showroom only,while normally other teams check few showroom in few days.and that's also shows our sincere and heart to helps them to settle the problem and not to get blame by highest management.
however,in their mind,we are just bringing problems for them,stock lost need to be pay by them once checked,and we 'anti' them,cause keep on checking the stocks,wants them to compensate for the stocks lost.
Once problem arise,beg us "really want take such actions,don't you feel pity for us?our family?kids?" this is not the issue,but correct for them,we do pity,but how pity also,work still need to be done..if not,help them cover?? then who pity us back??we don't have family?
We just working,serving company,company earn how much,loss how much also not ours.So,work should be done accordingly,responsible,don't harm anyone...we work to earn livings..some peoples says work is to earn experience,experience is important than payment,still correct,but with reasonable payments...if works without reasonable payment,just earn experience,does experience give u monthly income?? does experience can be foods for their family?can be income for living?so...it's still back to the title->what's right,what's wrong~So...do things accordingly...
No comments:
Post a Comment